What Research can do

Research can discover scholarly papers and general web resources, evaluate selected public sources, and produce durable artifacts with evidence, relevance, recommendations, and limitations.

Discovery

Papers + web

The request can use one or both implemented research surfaces.

Source size

80k characters

A source page up to the supported size can become a saved result; larger pages are declined rather than cut down.

Output

One artifact

Each completed source becomes a structured result that keeps its evidence and origin together.

Section 1

Find the right material

You can look across scholarly papers, general web resources, or both, then narrow the search by date, language, trusted sites, and domains. These choices help the investigation spend its effort on material that is more likely to answer the question.

Research reviews a set of search results and saves only the sources that are deliberately selected. This keeps promising leads separate from finished evidence and prevents an unreviewed link from appearing in the final collection.

Choose a preset or request up to 1,000 sources.
Keep discovery effort visible and predictable.
Avoid rediscovering sources already saved in the thread.

Section 2

Read only what can become evidence

Selected public links are checked and read one at a time. If a page is unavailable or too large, that source is recorded as its own outcome so the rest of the investigation can still succeed.

Each finished result answers the original question using the selected source and keeps the source identity attached. This makes it possible to inspect where a result came from instead of treating every answer as an unsupported summary.

Only public, usable links become candidates for a saved result.
Exactly 80,000 characters is accepted; 80,001 is declined before a summary is created.
A source can fail on its own while completed results remain available.

Section 3

Get an artifact you can inspect

Artifact part	Why it matters
Summary	Explains what the source says while keeping the result tied to the material that was read.
Relevance	Shows why this source matters to the question that started the investigation.
Key claims and evidence	Keeps the important findings available for later review and comparison.
Recommendations and limitations	Makes the next useful step and the remaining uncertainty easy to see.
Provenance	Keeps the source link and its reading status attached to the result.